Interpretive Trespassing: Sought Consensus That They Can Attribute To You Without Your Participation Because Reality Altogether Would Remove These Bitches Supposed Authority To Speak In Your Place

Fuckhead and company made themselves the center of a meaning that did not require them, refused to learn native architecture, and nevertheless claimed the authority to define built from a place of assumptions….well we all know what happens when you assume.

Your discipline will carry you further than feel good social consensus in a closed circuit of confirmation where reality is no longer permitted to correct these people because their authority depends on never making contact with reality at all. Either this is social media 101 or Earth 101 I can’t tell.

An incompetent designation or a credibility damaging misclassification does not have to convince everyone, rather, it only has to contaminate the conditions of recognition so that otherwise neutral details or even the very features once recognized as signs of authorship can be retroactively reframed and renamed as evidence of fraud. Misclassification did not merely damage reputation here, it essentially reallocated interpretive authority to the accuser in an attempt to create a permanent interpretive environment around everything else you do/make/live as. Essentially they wagered on predictable dysfunction….uh oh, be a shame if reality did not cooperate.

As a side note…

Accurate naming can tolerate contradiction…I was just thinking of this as I told the story of the coding books my mother gave me as a child…There was the child she cultivated and the child she abandoned, but a true detail can be recruited into an untrue conclusion when misapplied in either direction. What was given cannot be made to testify against what was withheld and we do not owe anyone a false conclusion merely because both truths exist and are emotionally difficult to hold.